Were We Causing Global Warming?





Many people today are worried that “climate change” is threatening life on earth. It used to be known as “global warming” but the global temperature has been not been rising since 2002. They often blame pollution from modern industry, which is increasing the amount of certain atmospheric gases, such as carbon dioxide, that trap heat. Some individuals have gone so far as to say that we must take immediate action to halt global warming—climate change—to prevent catastrophic consequences within the next century. What are we to make of such claims?

First, there was evidence that global warming was indeed happening. Virtually all the glaciers in the world had receded in the last century. Measurements indicated that the earth’s global average temperature had gone up 1.2°F (0.7°C) from 1880 to 2000. This really isn’t very much of a change, and there is much reason to believe that even that number has been inflated. In any case, there was good reason to believe that the earth had warmed in the last century, until 2000, if only slightly.

In addition, we know that industry releases certain gases into the atmosphere, and many of these gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, tend to reflect infrared radiation. This means that they trap heat and warm the earth much the way a greenhouse does—hence the term the “greenhouse effect.” Theoretically, an increase in the abundance of these greenhouse gases would trap more heat, leading to an increase in the earth’s temperature. In reality, it’s far more complicated than this. Let’s consider a few important facts.

It’s very important to note that changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide do not always correlate well with changes in the earth’s temperature. For example, the earth’s temperature rose substantially from 1910 to 1940, yet the carbon dioxide levels rose only slightly.  Conversely, the global temperature has been falling since 2002, even though carbon dioxide levels continue to rise. There were substantial changes in climate in the ninth and seventeenth centuries, and yet these certainly cannot be due to carbon dioxide produced by industry. By Dr. Jason Lisle, who earned his Ph.D from the University of Colorado at Boulder.

See also “The Premeditated Science of Climate Change” below.




“I Made a Mistake”

“Global warming has not occurred as I had expected. …The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened.”

“The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now.”

- James Lovelock, the maverick scientist who became a guru to the environmental movement

Lovelock points to Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” and Tim Flannery’s “The Weather Makers” as other examples of “alarmist” forecasts of the future. You’re about to understand that there has been no change in “alarmists’ forecasts of the future” in the new and improved “climate change” propaganda.





Record Antarctica Ice Contradicts Global Warming Trend

As climatologists worry about the effects of global warming, Antarctica has quietly set a new record for the greatest sea ice extent ever measured at either pole, according to various sources.






The Premeditated Science of Climate Change

The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, reported that climate change was the result of human activity, specifically the burning of fossil fuels that emit “greenhouse gases.”

“That’s the result that they get when they premeditate their science,” said Dr. Timothy Ball, an expert in climatology and former professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg.

In 1992 the IPCC commissioned the research to only study human activity in this context. They simply ignored what’s known as “natural variability” and that natural variability changes over time. One natural variable ignored is activity of the sun, for example. Sun activity is not human activity, and therefore sun activity data is not considered.

“When you set out to establish a certain outcome and you program your computers to collect incomplete data, you shouldn’t be surprised if that’s the result you get. The problem is what they’re getting out of their computers is not fitting with what’s actually happening. Of course, that’s been the problem with the IPCC all along.”

The latest data actually show temperatures have dropped in recent years. The IPCC and other scientists have branded this as a “pause” in climate change. Ball said that characterization implies that temperatures are temporarily holding steady and will inevitably rise again soon. He said that conclusion contradicts what is actually happening.

“The temperature is going down and has for 17 years while carbon dioxide increases,” Ball said. “According to their hypothesis and model, that’s simply not supposed to happen. Rather than doing what they should do and coming out and saying, ‘Our science is wrong, our models are wrong and we apologize for all the inconvenience we’ve caused you,’ they’re just plowing ahead.”

The long-held contention of those who warn of climate catastrophe is that rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere lead to higher temperatures. So if that belief is incorrect, why are temperatures getting cooler?

“The sun is causing the cooling that’s going on. Sun activity has been declining ever since 2000,” said Ball.  

Ball told WND the deception of the IPCC and its allies can be seen in how the reports are released, with the policy statement drawing headlines while the contradicting scientific information comes later and is largely ignored.

The “premeditated” science is a major culprit for the climate-change concerns, according to Ball. But he also blames the media.

“The main reason they were able to get away with what they’ve gotten away with is that a majority of the mainstream media were complicit in what (the IPCC and other scientists) were doing,” Ball said. “This is where the Founding Fathers have been corrupted because they believed the media would be the watchdogs, the gatekeepers. The mainstream media have failed completely.”

Download and listen to this interview with climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball yourself; right-click here and choose “Save target as..”


Why the Movement Needed to Re-brand—Change Its Name to ‘Climate Change’

Understand the real nature of the “climate change” brand here



Is There a Political (Control & Power Grab) Trail to Climate Change?

In 1971, Patrick Moore, Ph.D. was one of several activists who founded Greenpeace in the basement of the Unitarian Church in Vancouver. The Vietnam war was raging and nuclear holocaust seemed closer every day. They linked peace, ecology, and a talent for media communications and went on to build the world's largest environmental activist organization. By 1986 Greenpeace was established in 26 countries and had an income of over $100 million per year.

In 1986, Dr. Patrick Moore resigned from Greenpeace because it became a movement of the Communist Party. Patrick Moore, PhD now believes much of the ‘green’ movement’s “agenda is a greater threat to the global environment than that posed by mainstream society.”

Patrick Moore, Ph.D., testified before the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight on Feb. 25, 2014:

"There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor changing of the Earth's atmosphere over the past 100 years. If there were such a proof it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists," testified Dr. Moore.

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states: 'It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming' since the mid-20th century.”

"'Extremely likely' is not a scientific term but rather a judgment, as in a court of law."

Moore, chairman emeritus of Greenspirit Strategies in Vancouver, Canada, also told the subcommittee: "Perhaps the simplest way to expose the fallacy of ‘extreme certainty’ is to look at the historical record.

"The increase in temperature between 1910 and 1940 was virtually identical to the increase between 1970 and 2000. Yet the IPCC does not attribute the increase from 1910-1940 to 'human influence.' They are clear in their belief that human emissions impact only the increase since the mid-20th century. Why does the IPCC believe that a virtually identical increase in temperature after 1950 is caused mainly by 'human influence,' when it has no explanation for the nearly identical increase from 1910-1940?"

From page 23 of the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight on Feb. 25, 2014’s report:

“When President Obama appointed Lisa Jackson as head of the EPA, she promised to “ensure EPA’s efforts to address the environmental crises of today are rooted in three fundamental values: science-based policies and programs, adherence to the rule of law, and overwhelming transparency.” During the EPA’s deliberations on the “endangerment” ruling for CO2, one of its top economic policy experts, Alan Carlin, a 35-year veteran of the agency, presented a 98-page analysis concluding that the science behind man-made global warming is inconclusive at best and that the agency should re-examine its findings. His analysis noted that global temperatures were on a downward trend. It pointed out problems with climate models. It highlighted new research about climate change that contradicts apocalyptic scenarios. “We believe our concerns and reservations are sufficiently important to warrant a serious review of the science by EPA,” the report read.

In response to the report Carlin’s boss, Al McGartland, emailed him, forbidding him from engaging in “any direct communication” with any one outside his office about his analysis. In a follow-up email, McGartland wrote, “With the endangerment finding nearly final, you need to move on to other issues and subjects. I don’t want you to spend any additional EPA time on climate change. No papers, no research, etc., at least until we see what EPA is going to do with Climate.” 

Kimberley A. Strassel, “The EPA Silences a Climate Skeptic,” Wall Street Journal, July 3, 2009, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124657655235589119.html

“These emails were leaked. So much for transparency, and so much for science.”  

In Their Own Words: Environmentalists Out to Dismantle Capitalism

“…Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion.”

A liberal Harvard lion blasts the EPA’s climate rule as an illegal power grab

Economic Growth in Developing Countries is Being Stunted by Western Environmental Policies

The proposed UN treaty to give rights to "Mother Earth" as well as other environmental treaties are fatally flawed because there is effectively no difference between the creator and creation.

Regarding Australia’s Misguided Carbon Tax, atmospheric physicist and MIT meteorology professor Richard Lindzen put it this way:

“I think there’s no disagreement in the scientific community that [the Australian carbon tax] will have no impact on climate, so it’s purely a matter of government revenue. And, as I say, I mean if they can fool the people into thinking that they really want to pay taxes to save the earth, that’s a dream for politicians.”

Al Gore-ithms, SpongeBob, and Global Warming

Earth Day is on Lenin’s Birthday

Solyndra Scandal Ends Green Jobs Myth   And despite this, the Obama Administration plans to finalize as many as 14 new loan guarantees for renewable energy companies, including nine for solar projects.

The real goal of cap and trade, “health care,” the $timulus, the devaluation of the dollar by printing money, and unprecedented and unsustainable debt, and illegal immigration is to rip the guts out of our private economy and transfer wide swaths of it to government control.




No Global Warming in 23 Years

October 1, 2014, marked 18 consecutive years without global warming. There has been "no significant warming trend in surface average temperature" in those 18 years, said Patrick Michaels, Ph.D, director of the Cato Institute's Center for the Study of Science.

Michaels, who earned a doctorate in ecological climatology reports, also points to findings by the University of Illinois' Polar Ice Research Center that Antarctic ice "is at its highest extent measured by the current microwave satellite sounding system" since 1978. "And if you take a close look at the Arctic data, it appears the decline [in polar ice] stopped around 2005/2006, which means we've almost had 10 years without any net loss in Arctic ice."

"If the surface temperature resumed the warming rate that we observed from, say 1977 through 1998, we would still go close to a quarter of a century without significant net warming because there's such a long flat period built into the record now," also reports Michaels.

Michaels spent three decades as a research professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia and was a contributing editor to the United Nations' second Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.

Former NASA Scientist: Global Warming Is 'Nonsense'

A prominent scientist and former NASA researcher has added his voice to those who challenge the "scientific fact" that manmade carbon emissions are causing global warming.

Dr. Leslie Woodcock is a professor emeritus of chemical thermodynamics at the University of Manchester in England, with a Ph.D. from the University of London, and served as a senior research consultant at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Laboratory in Ohio.

In an interview with Britain's Yorkshire Evening Post, Woodcock declared: "The theory of 'manmade climate change' is an unsubstantiated hypothesis.

"The theory is that CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel causes 'global warming.' In fact, water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere [than carbon dioxide].

"Carbon dioxide has been made out to be some kind of toxic gas but the truth is it's the gas of life. We breathe it out, plants breathe it in. The green lobby has created a do-good industry and it becomes a way of life, like a religion. [Please see the “The Spirituality Trail to Global Warming” below.] I understand why people defend it when they have spent so long believing in it."

Woodcock is also a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry, a founding editor of the journal Molecular Simulation, a recipient of a Max Planck Society Visiting Fellowship, and a former guest scientist at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology.

He went on to say: "If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It's an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people. [Please see “Is There a Money Trail to Global Warming?” below.]

"The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for thousands of years. If there are extremes, it's nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it's not permanent and it's not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.

"It's become almost an industry, as a consequence of this professional misconduct by government advisers around the world." [Please see “Is There a Political Trail to Global Warming?” below.]

He added: "You can't blame ordinary people with little or no science education for wanting to be seen to be good citizens who care about their grandchildren's future and the environment."



SMOKING GUN: NOAA'S Recipe for Global Warming Based on Cooked Books

You hear it all the time: This was the hottest summer or month or year on record. It didn't feel that way to you, but they're the experts ... they must have measurements ... right?

They do, but the actual measurements they have don't support what's being claimed. That's where "data tampering" comes in ...

Understand more here


And Understand More Here.





Video Collection

Here’s a collection of Internet videos exposing information used by global warming activists to promote their cause.  And what does Meteorologist John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel plainly say about global warming?



Summary of the So-called Science of Global Warming

In the face of claims that man is causing disastrous global warming, an objective look at the facts and additional evidence show otherwise. Natural processes on the sun account for over 50 percent of the claimed 1.2°F global warming, which is likely too warm. Since the climate simulations greatly exaggerate the temperature rise from an increase in carbon dioxide, these models cannot be trusted. Thus, man is likely responsible for only about 0.5°F warming—miniscule and likely impossible to mitigate. What is really needed is unbiased research in climate change. Climate disaster is not just around the corner; we have sufficient time for careful research. [Source]




Is There a Money Trail to Global Warming?

Global Warming Policy Economics 101

The Carbon Trading Market

For more insight, read Mark Schapiro's eye opening article in Harper's Magazine.




The Spirituality Trail to Global Warming

Spiritual dynamics are what drive the physical dynamics. Much of the environmental movement has gotten back to its pagan roots as it subtly fosters rejection of the Bible and Christianity.

So called Spiritual Greens tell us that Earth can save herself - she has the wisdom and power - humans don't. But we can help her by becoming conscious of the oneness and sacredness of all her parts.

To the extent the environmental movement embraces the philosophies of the New Age movement - it joins in that part of a strategy to control the American People, to derail and disempower traditional Christianity, and to deceive the world into adopting Anti-Christian views.

The New Age movement generally advocates a synthesis or recovery of ideas and practices, which celebrates our relationship with the Earth. (There are sub-currents in the New Age movement which include overt Satanic practices and those are definitely in conflict with Christian beliefs.)

The “Spirit of the Earth” Activists

The Environmental Health Sourcebook, Well Body, Well Earth, tells us to "turn to the traditions of ancient cultures" such as Buddhist meditations and Native American Hopi rituals in order to "reaffirm our bond with the spirit of the living earth." "The more you contact the voice of the living Earth and evaluate what it says, the easier it will become for you to contact it and trust what it provides."

That a granddaddy of environmental action agencies would publish The Environmental Health Sourcebook, Well Body, Well Earth recommending our communicating with the "spirit of the earth" is just one cause for Christians to be on the alert for satanic deception in the environmental movement.

Spiritual Greens take offense at the Christian belief that people are the most valuable of God's creation on earth. They believe that since everything on earth is connected and interdependent, no one element is more valuable than another.

In the New Age environmentalists view, humanity represents a great danger to the rest of creation because there is effectively no difference between the creator and creation.

Greens in all categories generally agree on the following:

- By resisting the return of earth-centered religions, Christians block the global movement toward the one-world religion needed to unify people and save the earth.

* To reverse the trend, storytellers and artists must revive earth-centered myth and reconnect us to Earth's spirit.

* Healthy, flourishing diversity requires a substantial decrease in the human population and its interference with nature's processes.

A New Age, a New World Order, a new world economic system, a new world ecology, and a new world spirituality. Behind this movement, however, are dark spiritual forces. Without understanding the nature of those dark forces it is nearly impossible to understand the unfolding of world events.

The New Age Message

1.        Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

2.        Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.

3.        Unite humanity with a living new language.

4.        Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.

5.        Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

6.        Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

7.        Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

8.        Balance personal rights with social duties.

9.        Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.

10.     Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

Limiting the population of the earth to 500 million would require the extermination of nine-tenths of the world's people. The reference to establishing a world court reflects the current move to create an International Criminal Court and a world government (see “ClimareGate” above). The movement's emphasis on preserving nature reflects the environmental movement since the 1990s, and references to "seeking harmony with the infinite" reflects the current effort to replace Judeo-Christian beliefs with a new spirituality; Humanism.

“… Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion.”

He [Jesus the Christ] is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.”  - Colossians 1:17

“See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ.”  - Colossians 2:8

“For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.”  - 2 Timothy 4:3-4

“They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.”  - 2 Thessalonians 2:10-11

“They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things rather than the Creator-who is forever praised. Amen.”  - Romans 1:25



See The Gospel According to Al Gore                See Major teachings of the New Age

“People, who do not believe in man-made global warming, are so beyond the pale of reasonable human discourse, that the only just and fair penalty for them is death.” This may seem a bit extreme to you, but as James Delingpole, author of the book Watermelons: The Green Movement’s True Colors, observed in a recent Heritage event, it is the very tone that many in the green movement set in today’s global warming debate.



The Religion of Secular Humanism

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a footnote to the 1961 decision of Torcaso v. Watkins, stated that different ideological systems – including secular humanism could be defined as religion. Yet secular humanism claims to be “pure" of religion and morality.

Socialism, “An Intermediate Stage”

A communist revolution is a proletarian revolution inspired by the ideas of Marxism that aims to replace capitalism with communism, typically with socialism (state-run means of production) as an intermediate stage. The idea that a proletarian revolution is needed is a cornerstone of Marxism; Marxists believe that the workers of the world must unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. Thus, in the Marxist view, proletarian revolutions need to happen in countries all over the world.  [Source]

“Hidden in Religious Terms”

“We will find our most fertile field for infiltration by communists within the field of religion because religious people… will swallow anything if it is hidden in religious terms.”  Vladimir Lenin, Russian Marxist revolutionary and communist politician who led the October Revolution of 1917

 “The world has never before known godlessness as organized, militarized and tenaciously malevolent as that preached by Marxism. Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin and at the heart of their psychology, hatred of God is the principle driving force, more fundamental than all their political and economic pretensions. Militant atheism is not merely incidental or marginal to Communist policy; it is not a side effect, but the central pivot. To achieve its diabolical ends, Communism needs to control a population devoid of religious and national feeling, and this entails a destruction of faith and nationhood. Communists proclaim both these objectives openly, and just as openly put them into practice.”  —Alexander Solzhenitsyn at Buckingham Palace, May 1983

Mainstream Media’s Indispensable Role

See a clearly documented account of the mainstream news media’s role in creating a world system of financial control able to dominate the political system of each country, and the economy of the world as a whole, divided into 6 shorter segments, Behind the Big News.

Things You Can Do

Pray For President Obama


Click Here


Click Here





Learning More Links

What is Govern-ment's Real Nature?              See also Socialism

Should Christians Be Involved in Government?

750 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming (AGW) Alarm

Scores of Peer-Reviewed Studies Contradict Global Warming Alarmism

More Peer-Reviewed Studies Contradict Global Warming Alarmism

Still More Peer-Reviewed Studies Contradict Global Warming Alarmism

12 Facts about Global Climate Change That You Won’t Read in the Popular Press

Does Carbon Dioxide Drive Global Warming?

Talking Points on Climate Change: Science, Economics, and More

Citizendium Wiki article on global warming

Why care about global warming?

There is no consensus

The real science

Frequently asked questions

Satellite temperature data

Economics of global warming

Natural climate cycles

A free-market response

Sock puppets for alarmism

Why do Alarmists and Realists disagree?

View "The Great Global Warming Swindle"

The Twenty-Three (and Growing) Smoking Guns of Global Warming

Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change

Climate Sceptics

CO2 is Green


Heartland Institute

Heritage Foundation


Minnesota Free Markets Institute


Plants Need CO2

Science and Environmental Policy Project

Science and Public Policy Institute


Related Subject of Cutting Energy Consumption

It's already happening, and not because of the ‘Nanny State.’ Heritage's Nicolas Loris explains:


When you take a look at America’s energy efficiency track record, it's not too shabby—and it's a result of innovation and cost reduction, not government mandates and regulations. Overall, energy consumption per real dollar of gross domestic product has dropped dramatically in the past 60 years, because we've innovated and become drastically more efficient in the process.

In short, America has achieved energy savings as a result of the free market—and the free market is fueled by consumer choice, the very thing big government regulators and politicians would like to take away. Fortunately, there's another way.




See the 21-fold Plan of God